Potawatomi vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Potawatomi
Chippewa
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Potawatomi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,785,913 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 92.3 Chippewa.
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.0%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $46,368, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($38,046 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.68%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $83,943, a difference of 0.80%).
Income Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,046 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,265 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,576 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,288 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,768 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,739 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,462 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,774 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $84,613 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,212 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.8%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Labor Participation Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.2% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.2% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.2% | Tragic 42.6% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.0% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Disability Metric | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |