Kiowa vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Kiowa
Chippewa
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Kiowa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,564,089 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 25.0 Chippewa.
Kiowa vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $83,943, a difference of 12.2%), median family income ($80,885 compared to $86,852, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $70,539, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,232 compared to $40,287, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $35,003, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($45,094 compared to $46,368, a difference of 2.8%).
Income Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,102 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $80,885 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $65,914 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,232 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,094 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,074 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,733 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,776 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,815 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,140 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Excellent 25.0% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 81.3% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (61.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 43.1% | Tragic 42.6% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.5%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, 1 year or more (51.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.0% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Kiowa vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (15.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Disability Metric | Kiowa | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |