French vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,654,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 114.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $46,368, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($43,685 compared to $36,631, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $83,943, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.0%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.5%).