Uruguayan vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Chippewa
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,008,214 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 57.4 Chippewa.
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $36,631, a difference of 21.0%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $83,943, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $53,847, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.6%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 37.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Tragic 42.6% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.8%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |