Pueblo vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,834,261 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $80,005, a difference of 16.1%), and per capita income ($32,012 compared to $36,631, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $53,847, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $47,015, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 104.4%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and single female poverty (28.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.9%), average family size (3.79 compared to 3.20, a difference of 18.5%), and currently married (38.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple households (40.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (34.0% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 19.9%), bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.89%), disability (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.3%).