Immigrants from Western Asia vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,818,684 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $36,631, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($90,005 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $83,943, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $53,847, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.99%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 56.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.9%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.42%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.88%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%).