Bermudan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,999,822 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.964. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.333% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 1,333.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,911 compared to $36,631, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($80,406 compared to $70,539, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($45,593 compared to $40,287, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $47,015, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $53,847, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.2%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.10%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 35.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%).