Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Chippewa
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,764,675 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 19.8 Chippewa.
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($77,631 compared to $70,539, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.7%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $36,631, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $47,015, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $53,847, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $80,005, a difference of 5.3%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Excellent 25.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and single female poverty (23.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 58.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.7%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Subsaharan African vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |