Ghanaian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Chippewa

Fair
Fair
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,635,354 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 72.3 Chippewa.
Ghanaian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,582 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $83,943, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $35,003, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $53,847, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.9%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricGhanaianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.3%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (42.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
42.6%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 74.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 31.6%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.6%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Ghanaian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianChippewa
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%