Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chippewa
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,188,640 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 106.3 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.1%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $70,539, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $83,943, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $53,847, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,997 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $98,205 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,560 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,682 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,860 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,945 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,302 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,171 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,086 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,975 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.0%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |