Turkish vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Chippewa

Exceptional
Fair
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,338,240 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 55.9 Chippewa.
Turkish Integration in Chippewa Communities

Turkish vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $36,631, a difference of 43.0%), median household income ($99,389 compared to $70,539, a difference of 40.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $83,943, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $53,847, a difference of 26.4%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricTurkishChippewa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
25.0%

Turkish vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 60.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 58.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.2%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Turkish vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 89.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%

Turkish vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
81.3%

Turkish vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.4%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 55.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
42.6%

Turkish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.7%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Turkish vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 78.9%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Turkish vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.9%).
Turkish vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricTurkishChippewa
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%