South American Indian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,887,891 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.944% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 943.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,446 compared to $70,539, a difference of 24.0%), per capita income ($44,206 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $80,005, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.93%), householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $35,003, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.4%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.2%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%).