Hmong vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Chippewa
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,986,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 10.799% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 10,798.9 Chippewa.
Hmong vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.9%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $70,539, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $80,005, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $35,003, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $36,631, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $46,368, a difference of 4.1%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.3%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 100.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 81.3% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.24%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.1%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.29%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hmong vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |