Yakama vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,032,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 29.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($33,009 compared to $36,631, a difference of 11.0%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,225 compared to $70,539, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($39,107 compared to $40,287, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $46,368, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.7%), receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 82.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.4%), family households with children (30.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and family households (69.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 44.0%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 117.2%), associate's degree (32.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 88.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%).