Luxembourger vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chippewa
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Luxembourger Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,757,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 Chippewa.
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,631, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $70,539, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.2%).
Income Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,663 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,183 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,418 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,640 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,300 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,891 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,379 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,237 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,536 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,967 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 25.0% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 60.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 56.9%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 21.9%).
Poverty Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.4% | Tragic 42.6% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 76.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%).
Disability Metric | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |