Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Chippewa

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,053,346 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.843. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Chippewa.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Chippewa Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $80,005, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $47,015, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $36,631, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $46,368, a difference of 7.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Excellent
25.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty (14.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (61.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
42.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.5%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.47%), disability (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanChippewa
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%