Immigrants from Portugal vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,389,642 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,740 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $80,005, a difference of 19.4%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $46,368, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $53,847, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $35,003, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 56.6%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%).