Hungarian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,295,430 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 113.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,426 compared to $36,631, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.8%), and median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $46,368, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $47,015, a difference of 6.9%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $35,003, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $53,847, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.2%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and bachelor's degree (38.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.8%).