Portuguese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,514,851 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,976 compared to $70,539, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $83,943, a difference of 25.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $80,005, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $53,847, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $35,003, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.98%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.9%).