French Canadian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,139,000 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $83,943, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $46,368, a difference of 18.0%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $36,631, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,847, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 38.1%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 58.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.1%).