Immigrants from Brazil vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,972,797 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $36,631, a difference of 31.5%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $70,539, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $83,943, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 46.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 78.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 43.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.79%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.1%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%).