Belgian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,367,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,951 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.0%), median male earnings ($55,361 compared to $46,368, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,060 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $47,015, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($38,382 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $53,847, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 43.9%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.3%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.3%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (63.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.7%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).