Lumbee vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,957 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 88.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $83,682, a difference of 38.8%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $47,380, a difference of 37.0%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $74,279, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $36,408, a difference of 12.0%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $42,430, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 73.7%), receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 69.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.1%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.7%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.90%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.3%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.9%).