Houma vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Iroquois
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,724,052 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.447% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 447.3 Iroquois.
Houma vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 54.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $87,255, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($30,343 compared to $36,408, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $83,682, a difference of 8.6%).
Income Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Houma vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 61.9%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 50.8%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Houma vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Houma vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 80.6% |
Houma vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (45.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Houma vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Good 6.5% |
Houma vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.7%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.7%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.87%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Tragic 1.6% |
Houma vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%), ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.5%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.7% |