Cuban vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,628,769 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $53,737, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $87,255, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($73,392 compared to $74,279, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $83,682, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.1%), receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.8%), family households (67.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.16%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 43.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).