Croatian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,412,696 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,383 compared to $87,255, a difference of 24.2%), median family income ($111,370 compared to $90,543, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,414 compared to $83,682, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $47,380, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($40,993 compared to $36,408, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.6%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 29.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.0%).