Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Iroquois

Average
Fair
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,160,501 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Iroquois.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Iroquois Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $47,380, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($84,011 compared to $74,279, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $87,255, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $39,104, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.2%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Excellent
25.1%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.4%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.69%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
80.6%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.38%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.0%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
6.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%

Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.22%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and female disability (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishIroquois
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%