South American Indian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Iroquois

Average
Fair
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,224,136 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.941. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.380% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 380.4 Iroquois.
South American Indian Integration in Iroquois Communities

South American Indian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,446 compared to $74,279, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $87,255, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $53,737, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $49,374, a difference of 10.4%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
25.1%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
38.2%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Good
6.5%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

South American Indian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
South American Indian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%