Argentinean vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Iroquois
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,680,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 46.4 Iroquois.
Argentinean vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $39,104, a difference of 27.5%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $74,279, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $87,255, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.2%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 43.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 27.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.32%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Argentinean vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |