Pennsylvania German vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,621,752 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $47,380, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $87,255, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,615 compared to $42,430, a difference of 0.43%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $90,543, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%).