Tongan vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tongans

Iroquois

Good
Fair
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Tongan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,810,101 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Iroquois.
Tongan Integration in Iroquois Communities

Tongan vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $53,737, a difference of 27.0%), median household income ($93,076 compared to $74,279, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $87,255, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.2%), per capita income ($41,693 compared to $39,104, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($45,665 compared to $42,430, a difference of 7.6%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricTonganIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,693
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,967
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,076
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,665
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,218
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,288
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,972
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,604
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,643
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,235
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Excellent
25.1%

Tongan vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 55.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 31.3%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricTonganIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%

Tongan vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTonganIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Tongan vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTonganIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Tragic
80.6%

Tongan vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.6%), family households with children (31.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%), currently married (48.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.16, a difference of 10.6%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTonganIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Tongan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.3%), no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 36.5%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTonganIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.9%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.5%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.5%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
6.5%

Tongan vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricTonganIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Tongan vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.21%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Tongan vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricTonganIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%