Kiowa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,290,519 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $87,255, a difference of 16.6%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.7%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $90,543, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $53,737, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $47,380, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.4%), single father poverty (22.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (18.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (26.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 12.9%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 27.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.9%).