Guatemalan vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Iroquois
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,429,187 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Iroquois.
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.7%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $49,374, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.52%), householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $83,682, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Excellent 25.1% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Tragic 38.2% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.5% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Guatemalan vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Iroquois |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |