African vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,980,431 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $83,682, a difference of 5.9%), and per capita income ($37,785 compared to $39,104, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $36,408, a difference of 0.34%), and median earnings ($41,955 compared to $42,430, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.48%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.4%), currently married (41.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.17%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.8%), associate's degree (41.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.4%), male disability (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.87%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%).