Malaysian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Iroquois
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,153,493 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.141% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 141.0 Iroquois.
Malaysian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $74,279, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $53,737, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.14%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $39,104, a difference of 0.23%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $36,408, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%), receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 38.2% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.74%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Malaysian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |