French Canadian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,988,863 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.569. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 31.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $87,255, a difference of 13.6%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $90,543, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $83,682, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,737, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $42,430, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.72%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.6%).