Soviet Union vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Iroquois

Good
Fair
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,072,514 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Iroquois.
Soviet Union Integration in Iroquois Communities

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $39,104, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $90,543, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $83,682, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $47,380, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $53,737, a difference of 17.0%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Excellent
25.1%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 45.2%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (60.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Tragic
38.2%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 59.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 37.1%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Good
6.5%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 77.6%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Soviet Union vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.1%).
Soviet Union vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%