Immigrants from Central America vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,037,818 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $39,104, a difference of 11.8%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $49,374, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $47,380, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,217 compared to $74,279, a difference of 0.080%), householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.59%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $87,255, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.17%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.2%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 92.0%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%).