Uruguayan vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,508,545 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 83.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,691 compared to $74,279, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $39,104, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $87,255, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.30%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $36,408, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $49,374, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 15.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.1%).