Immigrants from Guatemala vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,963,077 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.6%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $49,374, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.79%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $74,279, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.38%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 90.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and associate's degree (38.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%).