Immigrants from Argentina vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,894,393 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $39,104, a difference of 26.9%), median household income ($92,417 compared to $74,279, a difference of 24.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $87,255, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($41,554 compared to $36,408, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 43.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 40.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.3%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%).