Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,305,892 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 52.1 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,327 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $53,737, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $87,255, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $36,408, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.32%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%