Immigrants from Caribbean vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,842,005 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 23.0%), householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $53,737, a difference of 10.7%), and median family income ($83,319 compared to $90,543, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $36,408, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($41,119 compared to $42,430, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($71,860 compared to $74,279, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 44.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%), currently married (41.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 79.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 10.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%).