Hmong vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,006,113 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $83,682, a difference of 0.69%), median earnings ($42,111 compared to $42,430, a difference of 0.76%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.4%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.6%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%).