Filipino vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Filipino
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Filipinos
Iroquois
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Filipino Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,409,933 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 26.8 Iroquois.
Filipino vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $74,279, a difference of 55.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $87,255, a difference of 54.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $83,682, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 18.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $47,380, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $36,408, a difference of 36.0%).
Income Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $59,066 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $138,397 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $115,509 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $61,197 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $74,224 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,508 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,740 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,723 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $134,910 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $76,686 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 89.6%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 83.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.5%).
Poverty Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 80.6% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 66.3%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 48.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.55%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Good 6.5% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 115.1%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 104.6%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 75.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 71.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 52.7% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 23.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Filipino vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 58.7%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.7%).
Disability Metric | Filipino | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |