British West Indian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

British West Indians

Iroquois

Tragic
Fair
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in British West Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,014,878 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 56.7 Iroquois.
British West Indian Integration in Iroquois Communities

British West Indian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 39.2%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $36,408, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $47,380, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,636 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.53%), median family income ($88,987 compared to $90,543, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($75,647 compared to $74,279, a difference of 1.8%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,330
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,987
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,647
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,552
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,636
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,299
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,844
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,565
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,571
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,463
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
18.0%
Excellent
25.1%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
13.5%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
24.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 37.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
80.6%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.12%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and family households (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.83%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Tragic
38.2%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 171.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 87.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 26.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 54.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.9%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.4%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Good
6.5%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.93%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.4%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

British West Indian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
British West Indian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricBritish West IndianIroquois
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.99%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%