Lithuanian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Iroquois
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,229,421 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 90.7 Iroquois.
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $87,255, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $90,543, a difference of 27.5%), and per capita income ($49,448 compared to $39,104, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Excellent 25.1% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 47.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.8%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Good 6.5% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Lithuanian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Iroquois |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |