Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Singapore
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Singapore

Iroquois

Exceptional
Fair
9,307
SOCIAL INDEX
90.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
22nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Singapore Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,420,203 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to an increase of 135.9 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Singapore Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,353 compared to $39,104, a difference of 49.2%), median family income ($134,818 compared to $90,543, a difference of 48.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,429 compared to $83,682, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $47,380, a difference of 20.0%), and median female earnings ($47,986 compared to $36,408, a difference of 31.8%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$58,353
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$134,818
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$110,428
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,038
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$71,348
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$47,986
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,835
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$124,429
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$129,514
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,963
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 70.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 63.9%), and receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.4%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.5%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 49.1%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.050%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 130.5%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 109.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.3%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
74.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
70.1%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
58.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 61.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.5%).
Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from SingaporeIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.6%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%