Immigrants from Lithuania vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,111,911 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 103.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $39,104, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $87,255, a difference of 31.0%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $90,543, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $47,380, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $36,408, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 57.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.6%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.8%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.7%).