Laotian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Iroquois

Good
Fair
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,661,904 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 147.3 Iroquois.
Laotian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Laotian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $74,279, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $87,255, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $83,682, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.7%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricLaotianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Laotian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%

Laotian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianIroquois
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Laotian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Laotian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Laotian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.5%

Laotian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Laotian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Laotian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricLaotianIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%