Laotian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Iroquois
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,661,904 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 147.3 Iroquois.
Laotian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $74,279, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $87,255, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $83,682, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 38.2% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Laotian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |